Atlanta, United States: The Supreme Court of Georgia has explicated the standard of review that the commissioner of the Georgia Department of Community Health must utilize when inspecting a judgement of a hearing officer concerning an application for a certificate of need, or CON, to introduce a new health service at a hospital.
Former Commissioner Frank Berry had overturned a hearing officer’s denial of a CON for a hospital project expansion. However, rather than deciding if Berry’s reversal contained “competent substantial evidence,” as was the issue at hand, the Justices clarified that the meaning of the phrase in OCGA § 31-6-44(k)(1) is actually understood to denote substantial evidence that was admissible. This implies that the phrase is suggestive of a standard that does not allow the commissioner to reassess the evidence, scrutinize the credibility of witnesses, or displace his judgment on factual issues for that of the hearing officer based upon the commissioner’s proficiency.
This decision follows a series of courtroom debates over the authority of the commissioner, with the hospital’s initial certificate of need being vacated previously. Various litigations have been focusing on whether an intermediate appellate court erred in determining the expression ‘competent substantial
Insights on the Precast Concrete Market: A Booming Sector Welcome to another bright and bustling…
Exciting Developments in the Precast Concrete Construction Market Dublin, November 21, 2024 – It’s buzzing…
Folsom Welcomes a New Chief Building Official The city of Folsom is buzzing with excitement…
New Research Initiative to Ensure Safe Parking for Electric Vehicles in New York City New…
Exciting New Tool for Homeowners in Canada: Saving Big on Rooftop Solar Panels! If you…
Key Hires Signal Major Progress for The Nuclear Company in Washington In the bustling city…