Atlanta, United States: The Supreme Court of Georgia has explicated the standard of review that the commissioner of the Georgia Department of Community Health must utilize when inspecting a judgement of a hearing officer concerning an application for a certificate of need, or CON, to introduce a new health service at a hospital.
Former Commissioner Frank Berry had overturned a hearing officer’s denial of a CON for a hospital project expansion. However, rather than deciding if Berry’s reversal contained “competent substantial evidence,” as was the issue at hand, the Justices clarified that the meaning of the phrase in OCGA § 31-6-44(k)(1) is actually understood to denote substantial evidence that was admissible. This implies that the phrase is suggestive of a standard that does not allow the commissioner to reassess the evidence, scrutinize the credibility of witnesses, or displace his judgment on factual issues for that of the hearing officer based upon the commissioner’s proficiency.
This decision follows a series of courtroom debates over the authority of the commissioner, with the hospital’s initial certificate of need being vacated previously. Various litigations have been focusing on whether an intermediate appellate court erred in determining the expression ‘competent substantial
Washington D.C. Braces for Matt Gaetz as Attorney General: What's Next? **Washington D.C.** has been…
New Jersey Faces Drought Warning Amid Wildfire Threat As New Jersey grapples with an alarming…
Shayne Coplan's Home Raided by FBI in Polymarket Investigation New York City—Early Wednesday morning, the…
Exciting News for Event Lovers in Atlanta! Hey there, Atlanta! The buzz in town is…
Exciting News for Chicken Lovers in Georgia! Hello, chicken fans! If you’re in Georgia, get…
Explore the Vibrant City of Atlanta: Your Guide to Unforgettable Experiences If you find yourself…